O.K. I don’t like opinion pieces that start with a question, and yes this is going to be an opinion piece. So despite that, I’m going to start with a question, to wit: Why did George W Bush, in his first presidential campaign, refer to himself as a, “Compassionate Conservative”? I mean I understand the “conservative” part, he certainly was a conservative and, as the Republican Party’s presidential candidate he had damn well better be. No, what I’m asking about is the adjective that proceeds the word conservative: “compassionate”.
He didn’t insert, “Christian” (too obvious and to some possibly off putting), nor, “Staunch” (again rather obvious and completely lacking in cachet) nor, “Thinking Man’s” (William F. Buckley he isn’t), nor for that matter, “Everyman’s” (meh… it might have worked). He chose: “Compassionate” Well, to be honest, I don’t know if he chose the word. More likely it was chosen for him by someone in his PR cadre. Still, he used the phrase to describe himself, I heard him do it, so I’m ascribing its geneses to him. But why that word?
I’m going to suggest it was for the oxymoron-ness of it, for its jumbo shrimpy-ness. One does not find oneself using that word to describe any aspect of the conservative world view. Not normally. He used that word to describe something he wanted us to think was different about him, something that is contrary to what is a Republican norm, something that, were we to buy into it, might help him get elected, something that Republicans normally are not: compassionate. This tag line wasn’t trotted out in his second campaign. By that time he’d been stripped of his sheep’s clothing.
If there were ever a group of I’ve-got-mine-and-the-rest-of-you-fuck-off meanies it’s the Republicans and their testy wolf pack advance group, the Tea Party. This is where conservatism has gone to roost, in a selfish collection of grumblers who can’t think past their own wants. If Americans aspire at all to greatness one measure should be our ability to extend sheltering arms to everyone. This can’t be done, however, for free. It does cost. Caring about others, and its corresponding cost, isn’t in the Republican playbook. Shame on them.
I realize that the above has nothing to do with photography. Sorry.










